Quinn Vandecasteele vs Cooper Woestendick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Could second serve performance be a deciding factor? In recent months, Woestendick has excelled, winning 48.42% of points on their second serve compared to Vandecasteele's 44.38%.
• When evaluating return games, Vandecasteele edges slightly ahead on second serve return points, winning 46.66% versus Woestendick's 45.92%.
• On first serve returns, Vandecasteele again has a small advantage, achieving 29.54% compared to Woestendick's 28.22%.
• Under pressure, Vandecasteele has a higher breakpoint save rate at 61.11%, exceeding Woestendick’s 59.04%.
• In match outcomes over the last year, Woestendick has the upper hand with a 53.33% win rate, while Vandecasteele holds a 44.44% win rate.
• Surface preference might play a role—Woestendick performs best on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Vandecasteele excels on grass with a 67% win rate.
• Both players have played the majority of their matches at Futures/Satellites/ITF levels, with Vandecasteele achieving a slightly higher win rate of 51.43% compared to Woestendick's 50%.
• In terms of opponent quality over the past year, Vandecasteele typically faced higher-ranked players with an average opponent rank of 417.98, while Woestendick's played against an average rank of 468.47.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Woestendick appears more likely to clinch it, having won 40% of deciding sets compared to Vandecasteele's 22% win rate.
• Could break point conversion influence the match's outcome? Woestendick converts break points at 35.71%, slightly higher than Vandecasteele’s 32.95%.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

Examining recent performance indicators, Woestendick shows a marginal advantage in second serve efficiency, a critical metric that often correlates with match success.

Although Vandecasteele demonstrates slightly better return statistics, Woestendick's overall match win rate notably surpasses Vandecasteele's, suggesting more consistent performance in competitive scenarios.

With a pronounced ability to perform under pressure and a higher success rate in deciding sets, Woestendick seems more adept at handling critical match moments.

Considering these factors, while Vandecasteele presents formidable competition, Woestendick is statistically more likely to prevail in this upcoming match.